Skip to content

http://www.migrante-europe.net/

narrow screen resolution wide screen resolution Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size
You are here: Home News Migrants OFW Advised to Jump from Building Instead of Being Provided with Assistance by the Philippine Embassy
OFW Advised to Jump from Building Instead of Being Provided with Assistance by the Philippine Embassy PDF Print E-mail
Written by JANESS ANN J. ELLAO   
Friday, 26 June 2009 00:00

MANILA – Merlinda Aquino, 40, has been contacting the Philippine embassy in Riyadh for help. She wanted to escape from her project manager who has been verbally abusing her and return home to the Philippines. But instead of a rescue plan, Welfare Officer Nestor Burayag gave Aquino a choice between enduring her oppressive situation or risking her life. Merlinda Aquino, OFW abused in Riyadh

“It was not sarcastic. It appeared to me that he really wanted me to jump off from the 3rd floor of our villa,” Aquino told Bulatlat.

Not the first time

While Aquino had worked abroad before, this is the first time that she needed the help of the Philippine government. In 1994, she went to Macau to work for a coffee shop that her sister owned. Later, she worked for another restaurant, also in Macau, as a waitress, where she earned as much as P18,000 ( $681 at the 1994 exchange rate of $1=P26.417) a month.

“It was a beautiful experience,” Aquino said. In fact, she was very proud that it was through her work experience in Macau that she learned how to speak in english. But sometime in 2000, she decided to go back to the Philippines to attend to her two children who were having problems at that time and to her marriage that had already fallen apart.

She then opened a variety store, with her new partner Andy. But as years went on, she felt that it was high time that she started earning a decent income again, saying that she was not comfortable asking Andy for money to support her first two children.

Early 2005, she applied for overseas work at the Placewell Recruitment Agency, where she paid a total of P28,000 ($508 at the 2005 exchange rate of $1=P55.08), which included her placement and medical fees. The salary stipulated in the work contract she signed in the country amounted to 800 riyals, including her food allowance. While her salary may seem low, Aquino was optimistic that it was worth the sacrifice because they were promised that they could work overtime with pay.

But upon arriving in Saudi in March 10, 2005, she learned that her salary was further reduced to 660 riyals, including food allowance, and that they were not entitled to overtime pay.

Another Annasban Victim

Aquino did not know that she was employed under Service King Ornascom, a sister company of the Annasban Group. The Annasban group is one of the leading providers of manpower services in Saudi Arabia. In November 25, 2005, the Philippine Overseas Employment Agency banned the said company from employing Filipinos after receiving numerous complaints about the unfair practices of Annasban. But the recruitment ban was lifted on August 21, 2008 after Labor Attache Rustico dela Fuente reported that Annasban has reformed its ways of dealing with migrant workers.

Obviously, it was not the case. In fact, Aquino, just like other victims of Annasban, endured the low salary, lack of opportunities for overtime work and maltreatment from their project managers.

Aquino worked for a hospital in Abha as a caregiver to children with disabilities. After that, she was transferred from one working site to another, working as a cleaner in a local jail and and a caregiver at Enath Markaz Rehabilitation Hospital. She worked for three years. But on June 20, 2008, she decided to stop working because her work contract had already expired in March.

However, she was sent to another work site, the Kingdom Hospital, to work as a cleaner. She was promised that she would only work for a month as a reliever to a migrant worker who was on vacation. She was also told by her project manager that after a month, she would be given a choice between an exit or re-entry visa.

On March 16, 2009, she again negotiated with her project manager if she could go home for a month-long vacation. The project manager agreed but forced her to sign a blank paper. The project manager also promised her that should she come back to work after the vacation, her salary would be increased by 100 riyals. Then, in April 27, she finally arrived in the country, after more than a year of waiting to be sent back home.

“But I was surprised that my settlement fee was only 132 riyals,” Aquino said, attributing it to the blank paper that she was forced to sign before she left. This motivated her go back to Saudi in July 10, 2009. “Merely accepting the 132 riyals would put all my sacrifices for four years in vain.”

No help

Upon arriving in Saudi, the project manager asked her to sign another contract, which stipulated that she would be receiving the same salary as before. Aquino refused to sign the contract and her project manager started to shout at her. Since then, Aquino said her project manager gave her the cold shoulder.

Aquino went back to work, with the same salary but without a signed contract. She frequently visited her project manager’s office to follow up on her request for a higher settlement fee. “I was told that I had too many questions,” she said.

On January 1, 2010, her project manager told her that she would no longer be working for Kingdom Hospital, because she would be replaced already. Aquino was transferred to Al Osra Clinic, where she had an irregular schedule. She was told that she would have to work in the said clinic until her issues with the project manager had been resolved.

But five months passed. She continued following-up her status. No less than Nasban himself, one of the owners of the manpower services she worked for, faced her on May 17, 2010.

“He was very mad at me. He confiscated my cellphone, my money, my ATM and my Iqama,” Aquino said, “He said that if I do not want to go back to work, I should just stay in my villa.”

The following day, Aquino asked for the assistance of the Philippine embassy. She was able to talk to Burayag over the phone. “At first, he sounded fine. But as I told him my problems, he advised that I should escape from my employer.”

Aquino said she was shocked by Burayag’s advise to her because escaping from one’s employer would automatically make her liable for a criminal case. Through her co-worker Vilma, she was able to contact John Monterona, the Migrante Middle East Coordinator. She was advised to stay in the Villa.

Monterona asked Aquino to contact one of the people working for the embassy. But her phone call was eventually passed on to Burayag. The welfare officer again told Aquino that she would have to escape the villa, even if it entailed jumping off from the third floor of their building.

“If I would do such, can they guarantee that they would be able to help me? Could they guarantee that my employers would not be able to go after me once I am under their custody?” she said.

Through a friend, Aquino was able to get her partner Andy’s number. She informed him about what has happened to her and asked him to contact Migrante International for help.

Andy, together with Migrante, asked the help of all concerned government agencies in the country such as the Overseas Workers Welfare Administration and POEA. Then, on June 12, 2010, Aquino received the good news from her villa supervisor that she would be going home on June 13.

Aquino told Bulatlat that she is demanding for justice. She said she does not want Burayag to be simply replaced. “Because that means that he would be transferred to another embassy and would probably do the same thing as he did to me,” Aquino said, “He should be terminated to serve as an example to other government officials deployed abroad.”

Earlier this month, OFWs have called on the OWWA to probe and sack Burayag. But no action has been done on the case.

Migrante chairperson Garry Martinez said that Burayag’s attitude towards Aquino reflects the Arroyo administration’s general misconduct toward OFWs. “In truth, many of them connive with foreign employers such as Annasban in subjecting Filipino workersto dire working and living conditions.”

Martinez told Bulatlat that this should serve as a challenge to the next administration. “The path that OFWs are taking would remain dark, for as long as they are perceived as milking cows of the government to keep the economy afloat.” (Bulatlat.com)

 

Related Items

Newsflash

A human rights group warned Friday in their annual report that the year 2006 is the 'worst' for human rights in the country. The group Karapatan said that 185 activists have been killed in the last 11 months, a record since the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos was overthrown in 1986. (Philippine Star, Dec. 1, 2006)

Bookmarks

Technogenics